化学键的业余空间分享http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/chemicalbond My name is bond, chemical bond.
博文
[转载]天空为何是蓝色，而不是紫色？
|||
【注意到一个博主转载的文章，“天为什么是蓝色的”一百年 http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=316082， 读完之后，让我想起另外一篇科普文章： http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/BlueSky/blue_sky.html 这个问题看似简单，其实不然。一般人都不一定能够回答正确，所以转载如下。我把标题略作了修改，在文字上加了一些格式，图像也调小了点。哪位老兄有时间翻译一下，应该是个好作品。如有版权问题需要参考上面网页。另外，下面这篇文章没有提及爱因斯坦的具体解释，即空气分子密度的涨落对阳光散射的效果。前面那篇中文博客中提及了原始文献，可惜是德文，要不可以参考一下。有趣的是网上还有人对爱老的理论有争议， http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-2649.html 有兴趣和精力的人可以去挖一下，看看是否有价值的内容。】
Original by Philip Gibbs， May 1997.
Why is the sky blue?
A clear cloudless day-time sky is blue because molecules in the air scatter blue light from the sun more than they scatter red light. When we look towards the sun at sunset, we see red and orange colours because the blue light has been scattered out and away from the line of sight.
The white light from the sun is a mixture of all colours of the rainbow. This was demonstrated by Isaac Newton, who used a prism to separate the different colours and so form a spectrum. The colours of light are distinguished by their different wavelengths. The visible part of the spectrum ranges from red light with a wavelength of about 720 nm, to violet with a wavelength of about 380 nm, with orange, yellow, green, blue and indigo between. The three different types of colour receptors in the retina of the human eye respond most strongly to red, green and blue wavelengths, giving us our colour vision.
This is most correctly called the Tyndall effect, but it is more commonly known to physicists as Rayleigh scattering--after Lord Rayleigh, who studied it in more detail a few years later. He showed that the amount of light scattered is inversely proportional to the fourth power of wavelength for sufficiently small particles. It follows that blue light is scattered more than red light by a factor of (700/400)4 ~= 10.
Response curves for the three types of cone in the human eye
When we look up at the sky, the red cones respond to the small amount of scattered red light, but also less strongly to orange and yellow wavelengths. The green cones respond to yellow and the more strongly scattered green and green-blue wavelengths. The blue cones are stimulated by colours near blue wavelengths, which are very strongly scattered. If there were no indigo and violet in the spectrum, the sky would appear blue with a slight green tinge. However, the most strongly scattered indigo and violet wavelengths stimulate the red cones slightly as well as the blue, which is why these colours appear blue with an added red tinge. The net effect is that the red and green cones are stimulated about equally by the light from the sky, while the blue is stimulated more strongly. This combination accounts for the pale sky blue colour. It may not be a coincidence that our vision is adjusted to see the sky as a pure hue. We have evolved to fit in with our environment; and the ability to separate natural colours most clearly is probably a survival advantage.
A multicoloured sunset over the Firth of Forth in Scotland.
A blue haze over the mountains of Les Vosges in France.
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-437346-316112.html
Original by Philip Gibbs， May 1997.
Why is the sky blue?
A clear cloudless day-time sky is blue because molecules in the air scatter blue light from the sun more than they scatter red light. When we look towards the sun at sunset, we see red and orange colours because the blue light has been scattered out and away from the line of sight.
Tyndall Effect
The first steps towards correctly explaining the colour of the sky were taken by John Tyndall in 1859. He discovered that when light passes through a clear fluid holding small particles in suspension, the shorter blue wavelengths are scattered more strongly than the red. This can be demonstrated by shining a beam of white light through a tank of water with a little milk or soap mixed in. From the side, the beam can be seen by the blue light it scatters; but the light seen directly from the end is reddened after it has passed through the tank. The scattered light can also be shown to be polarised using a filter of polarised light, just as the sky appears a deeper blue through polaroid sun glasses.This is most correctly called the Tyndall effect, but it is more commonly known to physicists as Rayleigh scattering--after Lord Rayleigh, who studied it in more detail a few years later. He showed that the amount of light scattered is inversely proportional to the fourth power of wavelength for sufficiently small particles. It follows that blue light is scattered more than red light by a factor of (700/400)4 ~= 10.
Dust or Molecules?
Tyndall and Rayleigh thought that the blue colour of the sky must be due to small particles of dust and droplets of water vapour in the atmosphere. Even today, people sometimes incorrectly say that this is the case. Later scientists realised that if this were true, there would be more variation of sky colour with humidity or haze conditions than was actually observed, so they supposed correctly that the molecules of oxygen and nitrogen in the air are sufficient to account for the scattering. The case was finally settled by Einstein in 1911, who calculated the detailed formula for the scattering of light from molecules; and this was found to be in agreement with experiment. He was even able to use the calculation as a further verification of Avogadro's number when compared with observation. The molecules are able to scatter light because the electromagnetic field of the light waves induces electric dipole moments in the molecules.Why not violet?
If shorter wavelengths are scattered most strongly, then there is a puzzle as to why the sky does not appear violet, the colour with the shortest visible wavelength. The spectrum of light emission from the sun is not constant at all wavelengths, and additionally is absorbed by the high atmosphere, so there is less violet in the light. Our eyes are also less sensitive to violet. That's part of the answer; yet a rainbow shows that there remains a significant amount of visible light coloured indigo and violet beyond the blue. The rest of the answer to this puzzle lies in the way our vision works. We have three types of colour receptors, or cones, in our retina. They are called red, blue and green because they respond most strongly to light at those wavelengths. As they are stimulated in different proportions, our visual system constructs the colours we see.Response curves for the three types of cone in the human eye
A multicoloured sunset over the Firth of Forth in Scotland.
Sunsets
When the air is clear the sunset will appear yellow, because the light from the sun has passed a long distance through air and some of the blue light has been scattered away. If the air is polluted with small particles, natural or otherwise, the sunset will be more red. Sunsets over the sea may also be orange, due to salt particles in the air, which are effective Tyndall scatterers. The sky around the sun is seen reddened, as well as the light coming directly from the sun. This is because all light is scattered relatively well through small angles--but blue light is then more likely to be scattered twice or more over the greater distances, leaving the yellow, red and orange colours.A blue haze over the mountains of Les Vosges in France.
Blue Haze and Blue Moon
Clouds and dust haze appear white because they consist of particles larger than the wavelengths of light, which scatter all wavelengths equally (Mie scattering). But sometimes there might be other particles in the air that are much smaller. Some mountainous regions are famous for their blue haze. Aerosols of terpenes from the vegetation react with ozone in the atmosphere to form small particles about 200 nm across, and these particles scatter the blue light. A forest fire or volcanic eruption may occasionally fill the atmosphere with fine particles of 500--800 nm across, being the right size to scatter red light. This gives the opposite to the usual Tyndall effect, and may cause the moon to have a blue tinge since the red light has been scattered out. This is a very rare phenomenon, occurring literally once in a blue moon.Opalescence
The Tyndall effect is responsible for some other blue coloration's in nature: such as blue eyes, the opalescence of some gem stones, and the colour in the blue jay's wing. The colours can vary according to the size of the scattering particles. When a fluid is near its critical temperature and pressure, tiny density fluctuations are responsible for a blue coloration known as critical opalescence. People have also copied these natural effects by making ornamental glasses impregnated with particles, to give the glass a blue sheen. But not all blue colouring in nature is caused by scattering. Light under the sea is blue because water absorbs longer wavelength of light through distances over about 20 metres. When viewed from the beach, the sea is also blue because it reflects the sky, of course. Some birds and butterflies get their blue colorations by diffraction effects.Why is the Mars sky red?
Images sent back from the Viking Mars landers in 1977 and from Pathfinder in 1997 showed a red sky seen from the Martian surface. This was due to red iron-rich dusts thrown up in the dust storms occurring from time to time on Mars. The colour of the Mars sky will change according to weather conditions. It should be blue when there have been no recent storms, but it will be darker than the earth's daytime sky because of Mars' thinner atmosphere.http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-437346-316112.html
全部作者的其他最新博文
热门博文导读
相关博文
- • 蓝色大海，蓝色刷手服——小医生随笔
- • 蓝色的亚马逊和特林达德岛 － 钓鱼岛之梦
- • 难忘故乡的云
- • 蓝色的青海湖
- • BJ天空美如画（私人记忆）
- • 贪心的悟空
0
发表评论 评论 (1 个评论)
- [1]吴国胜
- 经过王晓钢先生的提示，网上查出那篇转载的中文是方 励 之先生的作品。
http://blog.bandao.cn/archive/69221/blogs-714945.aspx
博主回复：王晓钢：我指的是您在引言里说的：
“有趣的是网上还有人对爱老的理论有争议， http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-2649.html 有兴趣和精力的人可以去挖一下，看看是否有价值的内容。”
我去看了一下，那里说：However according to recent posts on PF, revisionists have overturned Einstein, dismissed the idea that the blue is caused by scattering from N2 and O2 molecules, and demonstrated that it is caused by an alternative mechanism---fluctuations in air density.
这些说Einstein不对的“修正主义者们”（revisionists）的recent posts on PF，做的事情就是：dismissed the idea that the blue is caused by scattering from N2 and O2 molecules, and demonstrated that it is caused by an alternative mechanism---fluctuations in air density.这就是
我括弧里简单总结的：“不应该是氧和氮分子本身的散射，而应该是密度的涨落”——而这正是Einstein本人的贡献（当然严格说应该是：不仅仅是氧和氮分子本身，而要考虑密度的涨落）。
那个链接又说：This is certainly possible but no URLs have been offered to allow verification.
就是说：找不到所谓 Einstein proved wrong 的出处。
1/1 | 总计:1 | 首页 | 上一页 | 下一页 | 末页 | 跳转
|
No comments:
Post a Comment