http://www.lsgc.com/who-we-are/why-lsgc/featured-articles/

http://jackkruse.com/energy-epigenetics-9-quantum-sleep/
When the electric current changes it also means the polarity of the magnetic field in the brain and in nerves has to change in sleep and under anesthesia. The reason is based upon Maxwell law’s of electromagnetism for which these two findings belong to.
Readers Summary
- How did modern researchers miss what other already found 55 years ago?
- Does the quantum action of sleep drive you away from consensus?
- Sleep semiconduction concussion/PTSD and “Quantum You.”
- How does quantum sleep set the stage for quantum memory?
- Hoe does neolithic disease initially manifest?
Truer words have never been spoken than this quote. Today, I am going to show you how sleep mechanistically really happens in you and all humans. In my view, the modern biology of sleep can be viewed as an emergent property of the physical laws of chemistry, which, in turn, can be viewed as an emergent property of subatomic particle physics and how those particle interact. The interaction of these particles often causes consternation and confusion in people who have a “biologic bent” in their mind’s eye. I suggest if you are one of these people, you begin to embrace the complexity and paradox. Because when you do, you begin to see quantum actions specifically, not driving your own “consensus in thought.” This is often what biologists cling to. You should not embrace group thinking ever. Look at the complexity of elemental parts and the behavior they exhibit. Often the whole exceeds the sum of the parts in the quantum world. See and feel what they do, to understand why they do it in this way. Soon you will see the beauty in nature’s quantum actions, which creates a conflict in the mind on purpose, which allows us to see things with more ‘dimensions’ than we are capable of appreciating with our senses.
Quantum Sleep
Recently, several science magazines have reported on a study about neuronal firing and sleep. I smiled when I saw it. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(28), 11650-5.
During waking hours, electrical signals travel from dendrites — antenna-like projections at one end of the cell — through the cell body. From the cell body, they then travel the length of the axon, a single long projection at the other end of the cell. This electrical signal stimulates the release of chemicals at the end of the axon, which bind to dendrites on adjacent cells, stimulating these recipient cells to fire electrical signals, and so on. When groups of cells repeatedly fire in this way, the electrical signals increase in intensity. Dr. Bukalo and her team examined electrical signals that traveled in reverse from the cell’s axon, to the cell body and out its many dendrites. The reverse firing, depicted in this diagram, happens during sleep and at rest, appearing to reset the cell and priming it to learn new information.
Gerard was working on the DC electric current in frogs way before Dr. Becker took up the challenge in other animals. Gerard never took his experiments as far as Becker did with respect to the brain. In fact, when Becker was at the VA in Syracuse, NY, he had trouble getting funding for his DC electric current research in the peripheral nervous system in the late 1950s. Ironically, this happened even though in four years he published massive amount of papers on his findings on salamanders and on bone physiology. So he complained to the Dean of the medical school at the time, who had happened to work with Gerard in Chicago. When the Dean saw just how much Becker had done and how he was pushing the boundaries of Gerard’s original work, Becker got his funding rapidly. With that money, Becker quickly ran a series of unbelievably important experiments (that most still have no clue about).
In these experiments, he proved how anesthesia works mechanistically and how sleep and wakefulness happen globally. The problem was, he did not realize what he found back then. Why? Because many other discoveries had yet to have been made to allow him to understand the data back then. I realized the brilliance of his work immediately when I read it in 2008. Let us see first what Gerard did to make sense of what Becker did.
No comments:
Post a Comment