More troubles with cognitive neuroscience. Einstein's theory ...
www.academia.edu/.../More_troubles_with_cognitive_neu...
Academia.edu
Loading...
Lector dr. Gabriel Vacariu - | Facultatea de Filosofie
filosofie.unibuc.ro/cv_gabriel_vacariu/
University of Bucharest
Loading...
[PDF]GABRIEL VACARIU - CV - Facultatea de Filosofie
Gabriel Vacariu | University of Bucharest - Academia.edu
unibuc.academia.edu/GabrielVacariu
Gabriel Vacariu (Bucharest Univ.) "Did Markus ... - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLpzaaSE8L8
Dec 5, 2013 - Uploaded by Gabriel Vacariu
(December 2013) In this clip, Gabriel Vacariu (Philosophy, Bucharest University) analyzes ... Gabriel Vacariu ...Gabriel VACARIU - Facultatea de Filosofie
ub-filosofie.ro/~vacariu/
Gabriel Vacariu (Bucharest University: Did Markus ... - Vimeo
vimeo.com/81107956
Vimeo
Loading...
Dec 5, 2013
In this clip, Gabriel Vacariu (Philosophy, Bucharest University) analyzes the UNBELIEVABLE ... My CV at ...ROPHIDAS
www.rophidas.ro/filosofi_de_azi.php?.../Gabriel%20V...
Translate this page
Translate this page
Gabriel Vacariu | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/gabriel.vacariu.9
[PDF]GABRIEL VACARIU - PhilPapers
philpapers.org/archive/VACMTW-4.pdf
by G Vacariu - 2014 - Related articles
Einstein's theory of relativity and the hyperverse / Gabriel. Vacariu. - Bucureşti: Editura ...... Did Markus Gabriel plagiarize my ideas?1 Reading his CV (he knowsEinstein’s theory of relativity does not fit with our common sense that is the result of the evolution of species and the development of each individual in a “standard environment”. This “standard environment” refers, in this case, to that speed much smaller than the speed of light.
It has been almost a century since Einstein informed the world of his dramatic discovery, yet most of us still see space and time in absolute terms. Special relativity is not in our bones—we do not feel it. Its implications are not a central part of our intuition.
(Greene 1999, p. 17)
Obviously, it has been difficult to fit the theory of relativity with the “reality” (the “world”) working within the unicorn world paradigm. The question is how could we understand that the absolute spatio-temporal framework does not exist, but instead there are only
relative spatio-temporal frameworks
(from the viewpoint of a person in the train and from the viewpoint of a person on the pavement, for instance) if there is only one ontological world? Let us suppose that the person A in the train and the person B on the ground both perceive a table placed on the ground. What do they perceive? Do they perceive the same, identical table? Within the special theory of relativity, for A and B there are different spatio-temporal frameworks and therefore the table cannot be the “same” table! However, we cannot talk about two different tables simply because in reality there are no absolute “different tables”. The correct answer can be given only within the EDWs perspective: there are epistemologically different tables.
No comments:
Post a Comment